Xeon Gold 6240R vs EPYC 7302P
Xeon Gold 6240R
EPYC 7302P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6240R
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7302P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6240R | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,444) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6240R | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,444) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6240R and EPYC 7302P
Xeon Gold 6240R
The Xeon Gold 6240R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,353 points. Launch price was $2,200.
EPYC 7302P
The EPYC 7302P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,690 points. Launch price was $825.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6240R packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 7302P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6240R has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240R versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302P — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6240R uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7302P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6240R scores 33,353 against the EPYC 7302P's 32,690 — a 2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6240R. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,500 vs 11,500 (64.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,212 vs 1,320, a 8.5% lead for the EPYC 7302P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,218 vs 11,450 (40.2% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). L3 cache: 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240R vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302P.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6240R | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+21% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 35.75 MB+12% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 33,353+2% | 32,690 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 22,500+96% | 11,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,212 | 1,320+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,218+50% | 11,450 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6240R uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7302P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The EPYC 7302P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6240R) vs 8 (EPYC 7302P). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6240R) vs 128 (EPYC 7302P) — the EPYC 7302P offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6240R) and SP3 (EPYC 7302P).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6240R | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 4096 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 128+167% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6240R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6240R) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302P). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6240R targets Server / High-load computing, EPYC 7302P targets Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6240R rivals EPYC 7402; EPYC 7302P rivals Xeon Gold 6230.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6240R | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, SEV |
| Target Use | Server / High-load computing | Server / Virtualization |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Gold 6240R and EPYC 7302P
