Xeon Gold 6248 vs Ryzen 9 270
Xeon Gold 6248
Ryzen 9 270
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6248
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6248 | Ryzen 9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6248 | Ryzen 9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6248 and Ryzen 9 270
Xeon Gold 6248
The Xeon Gold 6248 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,535 points. Launch price was $3,072.
Ryzen 9 270
The Ryzen 9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,602 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6248 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Ryzen 9 270 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6248 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 270 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 270 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6248 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 270 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6248 scores 29,535 against the Ryzen 9 270's 29,602 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 270. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,000 vs 16,500 (14.1% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,327 vs 2,636, a 66.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 270 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,277 vs 13,000 (16.1% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248). L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 270.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6248 | Ryzen 9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+150% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4 GHz+60% |
| L3 Cache | 27.5 MB+72% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB+1900% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 29,535 | 29,602 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,000+15% | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,327 | 2,636+99% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,277+18% | 13,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6248 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 270 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6248 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 270 — the Ryzen 9 270 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6248 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6248) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 270). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6248) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 270) — the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon Gold 6248) and FP8 platform (Ryzen 9 270).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6248 | Ryzen 9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB+300% | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 48+140% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 270 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6248) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 270). The Ryzen 9 270 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Gold 6248 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6248 targets General Purpose Enterprise Server, Ryzen 9 270 targets Professional Content Creation Laptop. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6248 rivals EPYC 7352; Ryzen 9 270 rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6248 | Ryzen 9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | General Purpose Enterprise Server | Professional Content Creation Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Gold 6248 and Ryzen 9 270
