Xeon Gold 6346 vs Xeon Platinum 8180

Intel

Xeon Gold 6346

16 Cores32 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8180

28 Cores56 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Xeon Gold 6346 vs Xeon Platinum 8180 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6346 vs Xeon Platinum 8180 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6346 vs Xeon Platinum 8180: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6346

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $7,301 less on MSRP ($2,708 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
  • Delivers 264.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($2,708 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (37,739 vs 38,259).

Xeon Platinum 8180

2017

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($10,009 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
    • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon Platinum 8180 better than Xeon Gold 6346?
    Yes. Xeon Platinum 8180 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8180 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8180 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon Platinum 8180 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6346 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8180 comes in 269.6% more expensive on MSRP at $10,009 MSRP versus $2,708 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6346 is also 264.6% better value on MSRP (13.9 vs 3.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon Gold 6346 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Xeon Gold 6346 vs Xeon Platinum 8180 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Xeon Gold 6346

    The Xeon Gold 6346 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 37,739 points. Launch price was $800.

    Intel

    Xeon Platinum 8180

    The Xeon Platinum 8180 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 38,259 points. Launch price was $10,009.

    Processing Power

    The Xeon Gold 6346 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8180 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8180 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6346 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8180 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8180 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6346 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8180 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6346 scores 37,739 against the Xeon Platinum 8180's 38,259 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8180. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6346 vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8180.

    FeatureXeon Gold 6346Xeon Platinum 8180
    Cores / Threads
    16 / 32
    28 / 56+75%
    Boost Clock
    3.6 GHz
    3.8 GHz+6%
    Base Clock
    3.1 GHz+24%
    2.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    36 MB (total)
    38.5 MB (total)+7%
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    10 nm-29%
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Ice Lake-SP (2021)
    Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
    PassMark
    37,739
    38,259+1%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Xeon Gold 6346 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8180 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6346 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8180 — the Xeon Gold 6346 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6346 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Gold 6346) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8180). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Gold 6346) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8180) — the Xeon Gold 6346 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Gold 6346) and Intel C621 (Xeon Platinum 8180).

    FeatureXeon Gold 6346Xeon Platinum 8180
    Socket
    LGA4189
    LGA3647
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0+33%
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    3200+20%
    DDR4-2666
    Max RAM Capacity
    6144 GB+700%
    768 GB
    RAM Channels
    8+33%
    6
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    64+33%
    48
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6346) / not specified (Xeon Platinum 8180). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6346 rivals EPYC 73F3.

    FeatureXeon Gold 6346Xeon Platinum 8180
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Xeon Gold 6346 was priced at $2708, while the Xeon Platinum 8180 came in at $10009. On launch pricing ($2708 vs $10009), Xeon Gold 6346 was $7301 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6346 delivers 13.9 pts/$ vs 3.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8180 — making the Xeon Gold 6346 the 113.9% better value option.

    FeatureXeon Gold 6346Xeon Platinum 8180
    MSRP
    $2708-73%
    $10009
    Performance per Dollar
    13.9+266%
    3.8
    Release Date
    2021
    2017

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.