Xeon Gold 6354 vs Xeon W-3335

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6354 vs Xeon W-3335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6354 vs Xeon W-3335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6354

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+62.5% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Draws 205W instead of 250W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($2,878 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).

Xeon W-3335

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,448 less on MSRP ($1,430 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
✅Delivers 100.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($1,430 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (39,293 vs 39,400).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 39 MB).
❌22% higher power demand at 250W vs 205W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6354 better than Xeon W-3335?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3335 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6354 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6354 also has the bigger cache pool with 62.5% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6354 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 62.5% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6354 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-3335 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6354 comes in 101.3% more expensive on MSRP at $2,878 MSRP versus $1,430 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-3335 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-3335 is also 100.7% better value on MSRP (27.5 vs 13.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6354 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 62.5% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 24 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 18 cores / 36 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 6354 vs Xeon W-3335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6354

The Xeon Gold 6354 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 39 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,400 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3335

The Xeon W-3335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,293 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6354 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon W-3335 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6354 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6354 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3335 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3335 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6354 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3335 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6354 scores 39,400 against the Xeon W-3335's 39,293 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6354. L3 cache: 39 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6354 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3335.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6354	Xeon W-3335
Cores / Threads	18 / 36+13%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4 GHz+11%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.4 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	39 MB (total)+63%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-SP (2021)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	39,400	39,293

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA4189 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6354 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 64 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Gold 6354) and W790 (Xeon W-3335).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6354	Xeon W-3335
Socket	LGA4189	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	64	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6354 rivals EPYC 7453; Xeon W-3335 rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6354	Xeon W-3335
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 6354 was priced at $2878, while the Xeon W-3335 came in at $1430. On launch pricing ($2878 vs $1430), Xeon W-3335 was $1448 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6354 delivers 13.7 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3335 — making the Xeon W-3335 the 67% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6354	Xeon W-3335
MSRP	$2878	$1430-50%
Performance per Dollar	13.7	27.5+101%
Release Date	2021	2021

Search Xeon Gold 6354 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.