Xeon L3360 vs Xeon X3360

Intel

Xeon L3360

65 WW2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X3360

95 WW2008
Similar parts
·······

Xeon L3360 vs Xeon X3360 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon L3360 vs Xeon X3360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon L3360 vs Xeon X3360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon L3360

2009

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,412 vs 2,424).

Xeon X3360

2008

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon X3360 better than Xeon L3360?
    Yes. Xeon X3360 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon X3360 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3360 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon X3360 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X3360 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon L3360 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Xeon L3360 vs Xeon X3360 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Xeon L3360

    The Xeon L3360 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,412 points. Launch price was $800.

    Intel

    Xeon X3360

    The Xeon X3360 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,424 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    In PassMark, the Xeon L3360 scores 2,412 against the Xeon X3360's 2,424 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X3360. Both processors carry 12 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.

    FeatureXeon L3360Xeon X3360
    Base Clock
    2.83 GHz
    2.83 GHz
    L3 Cache
    12 MB L2 Cache
    12 MB L2 Cache
    Process
    45 nm
    45 nm
    PassMark
    2,412
    2,424
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 2.0.

    FeatureXeon L3360Xeon X3360
    Socket
    LGA775
    LGA775
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0