CPU
GPU
Xeon L5335
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L5335 is positioned at rank 995 and the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is on rank 1037, so the Xeon L5335 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5335
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon L5335 | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($18) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clovertown (2006−2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Brisbane (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon L5335 | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+11%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($18) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L5335 and Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Xeon L5335
The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon L5335 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon L5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 versus 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. The Xeon L5335 uses the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon L5335 scores 1,737 against the Athlon 64 X2 5800+'s 1,745 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5335 vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+.
| Feature | Xeon L5335 | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 3 GHz+50% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+700% | 512 kB |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Clovertown (2006−2007) | Brisbane (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,737 | 1,745 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon L5335 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon L5335 | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA771 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Value Analysis
The Xeon L5335 launched at $380 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ debuted at $230. At current prices ($18 vs $20), the Xeon L5335 is $2 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon L5335 delivers 96.5 pts/$ vs 87.3 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ — making the Xeon L5335 the 10.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon L5335 | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380 | $230-39% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $18-10% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 96.5+11% | 87.3 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon L5335 and Athlon 64 X2 5800+
