Xeon L5335
VS
Turion X2 RM-75

Xeon L5335 vs Turion X2 RM-75

Intel

Xeon L5335

4 Cores4 Thrd50 WWMax: 2 GHz2007
VS
AMD

Turion X2 RM-75

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L5335 is positioned at rank 995 and the Turion X2 RM-75 is on rank 366, so the Turion X2 RM-75 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5335

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
45475%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
8586%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
7628%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
5893%
#537
Xeon Platinum 8180
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2363
84%
#538
Xeon Platinum 8280M
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $6223
82%
#539
Xeon Platinum 8280
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2940
81%
#994
Xeon E5-4627 v2
MSRP: $2061|Avg: $70
100%
#995
Xeon L5335
MSRP: $380|Avg: $18
100%
#996
Xeon E-2144G
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
98%
#997
Xeon X5675
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $22
98%
#998
Xeon Phi 7210
MSRP: $1881|Avg: $150
85%
#999
Xeon D-1567
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $230
85%
#1000
Xeon E-2126G
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $230
84%
#1003
Xeon D-1531
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $250
82%
#1004
Xeon 5130
MSRP: $316|Avg: $10
81%
#1006
Xeon E5-4640 v3
MSRP: $2859|Avg: $300
79%
#1007
Xeon E5440
MSRP: $690|Avg: $37
75%
#1008
Xeon E5-2643
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $50
74%
#1009
Xeon E5-2637
MSRP: $885|Avg: $40
74%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 RM-75

#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
99%
#354
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
513%
#355
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
505%
#356
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
464%
#357
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
462%
#358
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
457%
#360
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
442%
#361
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
424%
#362
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
423%
#363
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
411%
#366
Turion X2 RM-75
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#375
Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($18) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon L5335 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon L5335Turion X2 RM-75
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($18)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clovertown (2006−2007) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion X2 RM-75 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($18 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon L5335Turion X2 RM-75
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($18)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L5335 and Turion X2 RM-75

Intel

Xeon L5335

The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.

AMD

Turion X2 RM-75

The Turion X2 RM-75 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Xeon L5335 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Turion X2 RM-75 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon L5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-75 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-75. The Xeon L5335 uses the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-75 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon L5335 scores 1,737 against the Turion X2 RM-75's 1,717 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon L5335. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5335 vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-75.

FeatureXeon L5335Turion X2 RM-75
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.2 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+300%
1 MB
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Clovertown (2006−2007)
Lion (2008−2009)
PassMark
1,737+1%
1,717
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon L5335 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 RM-75 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon L5335Turion X2 RM-75
Socket
LGA771
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0