Xeon L5420
VS
Phenom II X4 910e

Xeon L5420 vs Phenom II X4 910e

Intel

Xeon L5420

4 Cores4 Thrd50 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 910e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L5420 is positioned at rank 847 and the Phenom II X4 910e is on rank 927, so the Xeon L5420 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5420

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
19386%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3660%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3252%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2512%
#478
EPYC 7702
MSRP: $6450|Avg: $2035
100%
#479
EPYC 7763
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $1513
100%
#480
EPYC 9734
MSRP: $9600|Avg: $6598
99%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
99%
#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
98%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
98%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
97%
#847
Xeon L5420
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#852
Xeon E5-2407
MSRP: $250|Avg: $25
99%
#857
Xeon 5120
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
97%
#859
Xeon W3530
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
97%
#861
Xeon W3520
MSRP: $284|Avg: $15
97%
#862
Xeon E3-1271 v3
MSRP: $727|Avg: $831
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 910e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
22786%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
21531%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15633%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4710%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3730%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3263%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1869%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1845%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1680%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1680%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1661%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1616%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1593%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1587%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1573%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
99%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
98%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
100%
#928
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
100%
#930
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
99%
#932
Pentium E6800
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#933
Core i3-530
MSRP: $113|Avg: $15
98%
#935
Athlon II X3 405e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#936
Core i3-2105
MSRP: $138|Avg: $30
97%
#937
Core i3-3225
MSRP: $172|Avg: $167
97%
#938
Athlon II X3 400e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#939
Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
96%
#940
Core i3-3220T
MSRP: $149|Avg: $146
96%
#941
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
96%
#942
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon L5420 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon L5420Phenom II X4 910e
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom II X4 910e ($69), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($69 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon L5420Phenom II X4 910e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L5420 and Phenom II X4 910e

Intel

Xeon L5420

The Xeon L5420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 March 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,143 points. Launch price was $380.

AMD

Phenom II X4 910e

The Phenom II X4 910e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,148 points. Launch price was $157.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon L5420 and Phenom II X4 910e share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Xeon L5420 versus 2.6 GHz on the Phenom II X4 910e — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 910e (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon L5420 uses the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X4 910e uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon L5420 scores 2,143 against the Phenom II X4 910e's 2,148 — a 0.2% lead for the Phenom II X4 910e. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5420 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 910e.

FeatureXeon L5420Phenom II X4 910e
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
12 MB L2 Cache+100%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+1100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Harpertown (2007−2008)
Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,143
2,148
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon L5420 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X4 910e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon L5420Phenom II X4 910e
Socket
LGA771
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon L5420) / AMD-V (Phenom II X4 910e). Primary use case: Phenom II X4 910e targets Desktop.

FeatureXeon L5420Phenom II X4 910e
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop