Xeon Platinum 8256
VS
Core Ultra 5 228V

Xeon Platinum 8256 vs Core Ultra 5 228V

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8256

4 Cores8 Thrd105 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 228V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8256

#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
106%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
104%
#128
Xeon Platinum 8256
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
99%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
99%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 228V

#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
107%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
107%
#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
102%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
101%
#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
100%
#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
99%
#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
95%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Platinum 8256 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon Platinum 8256Core Ultra 5 228V
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($295)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 5 228V ($295), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($295 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon Platinum 8256Core Ultra 5 228V
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($295)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8256 and Core Ultra 5 228V

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8256

The Xeon Platinum 8256 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 16,787 points. Launch price was $7,007.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 228V

The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8256 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 228V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 5 228V has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8256 versus 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8256 uses the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8256 scores 16,787 against the Core Ultra 5 228V's 16,955 — a 1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 228V. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8256 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8256Core Ultra 5 228V
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.5 GHz+15%
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+81%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
16.5 MB (total)+106%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+150%
Process
14 nm
3 nm-79%
Architecture
Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
16,787
16,955+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,932
Geekbench 6 Single
2,585
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,053
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8256 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8256Core Ultra 5 228V
Socket
LGA3647
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Platinum 8256) / Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Xeon Platinum 8256 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8256Core Ultra 5 228V
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 130V
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes