Xeon Platinum 8260L
VS
Core i7-3615QM

Xeon Platinum 8260L vs Core i7-3615QM

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8260L

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i7-3615QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon Platinum 8260L is positioned at rank 1030 and the Core i7-3615QM is on rank 307, so the Core i7-3615QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8260L

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
305622%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
57704%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
51268%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
39606%
#1030
Xeon Platinum 8260L
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $750
100%
#1031
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
100%
#1032
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
66%
#1033
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
41%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3615QM

#295
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
454%
#296
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
448%
#297
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
411%
#298
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
409%
#299
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
405%
#301
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
391%
#302
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
375%
#303
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
375%
#304
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
365%
#307
Core i7-3615QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Xeon Platinum 8260L (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2933, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon Platinum 8260LCore i7-3615QM
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($750)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3615QM (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon Platinum 8260LCore i7-3615QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($750)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8260L and Core i7-3615QM

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8260L

The Xeon Platinum 8260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 5,103 points. Launch price was $12,599.

Intel

Core i7-3615QM

The Core i7-3615QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,167 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8260L packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core i7-3615QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260L has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260L versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3615QM — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260L (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8260L uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3615QM uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8260L scores 5,103 against the Core i7-3615QM's 5,167 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-3615QM. L3 cache: 35.75 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8260L vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3615QM.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8260LCore i7-3615QM
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+500%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+18%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+4%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
35.75 MB+496%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
24 MB+9500%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
5,103
5,167+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8260L uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3615QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8260LCore i7-3615QM
Socket
LGA3647
FCBGA1224
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2933
Max RAM Capacity
4608
RAM Channels
6
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Xeon Platinum 8260L) / not specified (Core i7-3615QM).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8260LCore i7-3615QM
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
true