Xeon Platinum 8280M vs Core i5-13400F
Xeon Platinum 8280M
Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8280M
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8280M | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,223) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8280M | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2197%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,223) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8280M and Core i5-13400F
Xeon Platinum 8280M
The Xeon Platinum 8280M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 37,665 points. Launch price was $13,012.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8280M packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8280M has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8280M versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8280M uses the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8280M scores 37,665 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 40.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8280M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 35,400 vs 16,211 (74.4% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8280M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,214 vs 2,407, a 65.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,500 vs 11,408 (0.8% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8280M). L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8280M vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8280M | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+180% | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 38.5 MB (total)+93% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 37,665+50% | 25,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 35,400+118% | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,214 | 2,407+98% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,500 | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8280M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8280M versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8280M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8280M) vs 2 (Core i5-13400F). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8280M) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Xeon Platinum 8280M offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621,C622,C624,C627,C628 (Xeon Platinum 8280M) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8280M | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+967% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 48+140% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8280M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8280M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8280M targets High-end Server, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8280M rivals EPYC 7742; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8280M | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Server | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8280M launched at $10009 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($6223 vs $180), the Core i5-13400F is $6043 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8280M delivers 6.1 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 183.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8280M | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10009 | $196-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $6223 | $180-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 139.1+2180% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Platinum 8280M and Core i5-13400F
