Xeon Platinum 8571N vs EPYC 9175F
Xeon Platinum 8571N
EPYC 9175F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8571N
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9175F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8571N | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($418) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Emerald Rapids (2023) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8571N | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+819%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($418) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9175F
Xeon Platinum 8571N
The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.
EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8571N packs 52 cores / 104 threads, while the EPYC 9175F offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N versus 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F — a 22.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8571N uses the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9175F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8571N scores 68,385 against the EPYC 9175F's 65,894 — a 3.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. L3 cache: 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N vs 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8571N | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 52 / 104+225% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 300 MB (total) | 512 MB (total)+71% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Emerald Rapids (2023) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 68,385+4% | 65,894 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,961 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 60,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8571N uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9175F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8571N versus 6400 on the EPYC 9175F — the EPYC 9175F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) vs 12 (EPYC 9175F). PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) vs 128 (EPYC 9175F) — the EPYC 9175F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) and SP5 (EPYC 9175F).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8571N | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 6400+127900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 128+60% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454; EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8571N | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Cloud Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8571N launched at $599 MSRP, while the EPYC 9175F debuted at $4256. At current prices ($418 vs $3703), the Xeon Platinum 8571N is $3285 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8571N delivers 163.6 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9175F — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 160.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8571N | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-86% | $4256 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $418-89% | $3703 |
| Performance per Dollar | 163.6+819% | 17.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9175F
