Xeon Silver 4116T vs Xeon Silver 4210R

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Silver 4116T vs Xeon Silver 4210R FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Silver 4116T vs Xeon Silver 4210R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Silver 4116T

2017

Why buy it

✅+20% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 14 MB).
✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,187 vs 15,188).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4210R

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 17 MB).
❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4210R better than Xeon Silver 4116T?

Yes. Xeon Silver 4210R is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Silver 4210R is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4210R is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4210R still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Silver 4210R comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4210R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 12/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Silver 4116T vs Xeon Silver 4210R Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Silver 4116T

The Xeon Silver 4116T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,187 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4210R

The Xeon Silver 4210R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,188 points. Launch price was $511.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Silver 4116T packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4210R offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116T versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4210R — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4210R (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4116T uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4210R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Silver 4116T scores 15,187 against the Xeon Silver 4210R's 15,188 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Silver 4210R. L3 cache: 16.5 MB on the Xeon Silver 4116T vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Silver 4210R.

Feature	Xeon Silver 4116T	Xeon Silver 4210R
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+20%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.2 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.4 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	16.5 MB+20%	13.75 MB
L2 Cache	12 MB+20%	10 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	15,187	15,188

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Xeon Silver 4116T	Xeon Silver 4210R
Socket	LGA3647	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1024
RAM Channels	—	6
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Silver 4116T) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4210R). Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4210R rivals EPYC 7302P.