Xeon Silver 4214
VS
Xeon Platinum 8256

Xeon Silver 4214 vs Xeon Platinum 8256

Intel

Xeon Silver 4214

12 Cores24 Thrd85 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8256

4 Cores8 Thrd105 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Silver 4214

#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
106%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
101%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
101%
#133
Xeon Silver 4214
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
96%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8256

#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
106%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
104%
#128
Xeon Platinum 8256
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
99%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
99%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Xeon Platinum 8256 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Xeon Silver 4214 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightXeon Silver 4214Xeon Platinum 8256
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightXeon Silver 4214Xeon Platinum 8256
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Silver 4214 and Xeon Platinum 8256

Intel

Xeon Silver 4214

The Xeon Silver 4214 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,472 points. Launch price was $694.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8256

The Xeon Platinum 8256 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 16,787 points. Launch price was $7,007.

Processing Power

The Xeon Silver 4214 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8256 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Silver 4214 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4214 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8256 — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8256 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4214 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8256 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Silver 4214 scores 16,472 against the Xeon Platinum 8256's 16,787 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8256. L3 cache: 16.5 MB on the Xeon Silver 4214 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8256.

FeatureXeon Silver 4214Xeon Platinum 8256
Cores / Threads
12 / 24+200%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.9 GHz+22%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.8 GHz+73%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
16.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache
12 MB+1100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark
16,472
16,787+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureXeon Silver 4214Xeon Platinum 8256
Socket
LGA3647
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0