Xeon W-11865MLE vs Xeon E-2336

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-11865MLE

#1

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

6098%

#1

Core i9-9990XE

MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A

44%

#2

Xeon W-11855M

MSRP: $450|Avg: $200

114%

#3

Xeon W-11955M

MSRP: $623|Avg: $450

102%

#4

Xeon W-11865MLE

MSRP: $467|Avg: $350

100%

#5

Xeon W-11865MRE

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

96%

#6

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

1151%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

1023%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

790%

#16

EPYC 7302

MSRP: $978|Avg: $109

786%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E-2336

#130

EPYC 9115

MSRP: $726|Avg: $726

103%

#131

EPYC 74F3

MSRP: $913|Avg: $824

103%

#139

Xeon E-2336

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#143

Xeon W-1350P

MSRP: $311|Avg: $250

98%

#145

Xeon 6511P

MSRP: $815|Avg: $815

98%

#153

EPYC 7303P

MSRP: $594|Avg: $594

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Xeon E-2336 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Xeon W-11865MLE in both compute-intensive tasks (1.4% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Xeon W-11865MLE	Xeon E-2336
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($350)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-H (2021) / 10 nm)	✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-E (2021) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Xeon W-11865MLE	Xeon E-2336
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($350)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon W-11865MLE Benchmark Check

Xeon E-2336 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-11865MLE and Xeon E-2336

Xeon W-11865MLE

The Xeon W-11865MLE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 August 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,917 points. Launch price was $467.

Xeon E-2336

The Xeon E-2336 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,136 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon W-11865MLE packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2336 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W-11865MLE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-11865MLE versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2336 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2336 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon W-11865MLE uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E-2336 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-11865MLE scores 15,917 against the Xeon E-2336's 16,136 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E-2336. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11865MLE vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2336.

Feature	Xeon W-11865MLE	Xeon E-2336
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	4.8 GHz+7%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+93%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+100%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	15,917	16,136+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-11865MLE uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2336 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.