Xeon W-11865MRE
VS
Core i9-10900F

Xeon W-11865MRE vs Core i9-10900F

Intel

Xeon W-11865MRE

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core i9-10900F

10 Cores20 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-11865MRE

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
6365%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
46%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
119%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
107%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
104%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1202%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1068%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
825%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
821%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10900F

#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
107%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
44%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
43%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
106%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
106%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
105%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
42%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
105%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
104%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
42%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
104%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
104%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
102%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
101%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
33%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
100%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
100%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
32%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
100%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
100%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
30%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
100%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
100%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
28%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
100%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
99%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
25%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
98%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
22%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($600) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-11865MRE is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W-11865MRECore i9-10900F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)
More affordable ($300)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-H (2021) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-10900F ($300), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($300 less, 50% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W-11865MRECore i9-10900F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+102%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)
More affordable ($300)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-11865MRE and Core i9-10900F

Intel

Xeon W-11865MRE

The Xeon W-11865MRE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 August 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,589 points. Launch price was $480.

Intel

Core i9-10900F

The Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,800 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-11865MRE packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-10900F offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-10900F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-11865MRE versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900F — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon W-11865MRE uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-10900F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-11865MRE scores 19,589 against the Core i9-10900F's 19,800 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i9-10900F. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11865MRE vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900F.

FeatureXeon W-11865MRECore i9-10900F
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz
5.1 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+20%
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
19,589
19,800+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
13,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,701
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,456
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-11865MRE uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10900F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W-11865MRECore i9-10900F
Socket
FCBGA1787
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon W-11865MRE) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900F). Primary use case: Core i9-10900F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i9-10900F rivals Ryzen 7 3800X.

FeatureXeon W-11865MRECore i9-10900F
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon W-11865MRE launched at $600 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900F debuted at $464. At current prices ($600 vs $300), the Core i9-10900F is $300 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-11865MRE delivers 32.6 pts/$ vs 66.0 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900F — making the Core i9-10900F the 67.6% better value option.

FeatureXeon W-11865MRECore i9-10900F
MSRP
$600
$464-23%
Avg Price (30d)
$600
$300-50%
Performance per Dollar
32.6
66.0+102%
Release Date
2021
2020