Xeon W-1290E
VS
Ryzen 5 6600HS

Xeon W-1290E vs Ryzen 5 6600HS

Intel

Xeon W-1290E

10 Cores20 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 6600HS

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1290E

#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
111%
#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
101%
#88
Xeon W-1290E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
97%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
96%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-1290E is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W-1290ERyzen 5 6600HS
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) / 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 6600HS ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W-1290ERyzen 5 6600HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-1290E and Ryzen 5 6600HS

Intel

Xeon W-1290E

The Xeon W-1290E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,060 points. Launch price was $552.

AMD

Ryzen 5 6600HS

The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-1290E packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 6600HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W-1290E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-1290E versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600HS — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290E (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon W-1290E uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-1290E scores 19,060 against the Ryzen 5 6600HS's 18,975 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W-1290E. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290E vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600HS.

FeatureXeon W-1290ERyzen 5 6600HS
Cores / Threads
10 / 20+67%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+7%
4.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+6%
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+25%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
6 nm-57%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark
19,060
18,975
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-1290E uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W-1290ERyzen 5 6600HS
Socket
LGA1200
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%