Xeon W-1350P
VS
Core i9-10900F

Xeon W-1350P vs Core i9-10900F

Intel

Xeon W-1350P

6 Cores12 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core i9-10900F

10 Cores20 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1350P

#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
106%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
105%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
100%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
100%
#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
97%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10900F

#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
107%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
44%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
43%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
106%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
106%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
105%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
42%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
105%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
104%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
42%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
104%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
104%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
102%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
101%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
33%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
100%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
100%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
32%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
100%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
100%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
30%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
100%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
100%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
28%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
100%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
99%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
25%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
98%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
22%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($250) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-1350P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W-1350PCore i9-10900F
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($250)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-S (2021) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-10900F ($300), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($50 less, 20% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W-1350PCore i9-10900F
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+19%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($250)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-1350P and Core i9-10900F

Intel

Xeon W-1350P

The Xeon W-1350P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,611 points. Launch price was $311.

Intel

Core i9-10900F

The Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,800 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-1350P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-10900F offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-10900F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1350P versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900F — identical boost frequencies (base: 4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon W-1350P uses the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-10900F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-1350P scores 19,611 against the Core i9-10900F's 19,800 — a 1% lead for the Core i9-10900F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350P vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900F.

FeatureXeon W-1350PCore i9-10900F
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+43%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
19,611
19,800
Cinebench R23 Multi
13,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,701
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,456
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureXeon W-1350PCore i9-10900F
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon W-1350P) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900F). Primary use case: Core i9-10900F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i9-10900F rivals Ryzen 7 3800X.

FeatureXeon W-1350PCore i9-10900F
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon W-1350P launched at $311 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900F debuted at $464. At current prices ($250 vs $300), the Xeon W-1350P is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-1350P delivers 78.4 pts/$ vs 66.0 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900F — making the Xeon W-1350P the 17.2% better value option.

FeatureXeon W-1350PCore i9-10900F
MSRP
$311-33%
$464
Avg Price (30d)
$250-17%
$300
Performance per Dollar
78.4+19%
66.0
Release Date
2021
2020