Xeon W3503
VS
Core 2 Extreme X7900

Xeon W3503 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900

Intel

Xeon W3503

2 Cores2 Thrd130 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core 2 Extreme X7900

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W3503 is positioned at rank 978 and the Core 2 Extreme X7900 is on rank 1162, so the Xeon W3503 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3503

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
36913%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6970%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
6192%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4784%
#978
Xeon W3503
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#979
Xeon E5-2689
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $18
98%
#980
Xeon E5-2450L
MSRP: $1106|Avg: $78
97%
#981
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
97%
#982
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
94%
#983
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
94%
#985
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
93%
#986
Xeon E7540
MSRP: $1980|Avg: $146
93%
#987
Xeon E7530
MSRP: $1391|Avg: $146
92%
#988
Xeon E5-4627 v4
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $200
92%
#989
Xeon E5-4627 v3
MSRP: $2225|Avg: $200
91%
#990
Xeon X5660
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $10
87%
#991
Xeon E5-2667
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $31
85%
#992
Xeon E5-2690
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
84%
#993
Xeon E3-1565L v5
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $120
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Extreme X7900

#1150
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4185%
#1151
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4124%
#1152
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3786%
#1153
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3769%
#1154
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3734%
#1156
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3606%
#1157
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3458%
#1158
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3452%
#1159
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3359%
#1162
Core 2 Extreme X7900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1163
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
98%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1167
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1168
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
97%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
95%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
93%
#1177
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W3503 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W3503Core 2 Extreme X7900
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Extreme X7900 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W3503Core 2 Extreme X7900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3503 and Core 2 Extreme X7900

Intel

Xeon W3503

The Xeon W3503 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,125 points. Launch price was $65.

Intel

Core 2 Extreme X7900

The Core 2 Extreme X7900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $851.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon W3503 and Core 2 Extreme X7900 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon W3503 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X7900 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Extreme X7900 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon W3503 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme X7900 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3503 scores 1,125 against the Core 2 Extreme X7900's 1,115 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W3503. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Xeon W3503 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Extreme X7900.

FeatureXeon W3503Core 2 Extreme X7900
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,125
1,115
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W3503 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Extreme X7900 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W3503Core 2 Extreme X7900
Socket
LGA1366
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon W3503) / VT-x (Core 2 Extreme X7900). Primary use case: Core 2 Extreme X7900 targets Mobile.

FeatureXeon W3503Core 2 Extreme X7900
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile