Xeon W3565 vs Core i5-7200U
Xeon W3565
Core i5-7200U
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W3565 is positioned at rank 827 and the Core i5-7200U is on rank 643, so the Core i5-7200U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3565
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7200U
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W3565 | Core i5-7200U |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($69) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W3565 | Core i5-7200U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($69) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3565 and Core i5-7200U
Xeon W3565
The Xeon W3565 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,391 points. Launch price was $70.
Core i5-7200U
The Core i5-7200U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,369 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The Xeon W3565 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-7200U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon W3565 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3565 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-7200U — a 11% clock advantage for the Xeon W3565 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon W3565 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-7200U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3565 scores 3,391 against the Core i5-7200U's 3,369 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W3565. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3565 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-7200U.
| Feature | Xeon W3565 | Core i5-7200U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.46 GHz+12% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+28% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+167% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,391 | 3,369 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 513 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,726 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W3565 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-7200U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Xeon W3565 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-7200U — the Core i5-7200U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7200U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 24 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon W3565) vs 2 (Core i5-7200U). PCIe lanes: 36 (Xeon W3565) vs 12 (Core i5-7200U) — the Xeon W3565 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Xeon W3565 | Core i5-7200U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | BGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR4-2133+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 24 GB | 32 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 3+50% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 36+200% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon W3565) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7200U). The Core i5-7200U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 620), while the Xeon W3565 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7200U targets Mobile.
| Feature | Xeon W3565 | Core i5-7200U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 620 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W3565 and Core i5-7200U
