Xeon W3565
VS
A10-7850K

Xeon W3565 vs A10-7850K

Intel

Xeon W3565

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2009
VS
AMD

A10-7850K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W3565 is positioned at rank 827 and the A10-7850K is on rank 375, so the A10-7850K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3565

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
18025%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3403%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3024%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2336%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
100%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
99%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
99%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
98%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
96%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
95%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
94%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
100%
#837
Xeon W3550
MSRP: $294|Avg: $30
96%
#839
Xeon E5-2450
MSRP: $694|Avg: $795
94%
#840
Xeon E5-2630L v2
MSRP: $612|Avg: $149
94%
#842
Xeon E3-1246 v3
MSRP: $667|Avg: $215
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-7850K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5510%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5207%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3780%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1139%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
902%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
789%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
452%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
446%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
406%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
406%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
402%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
391%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
385%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
384%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
380%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
100%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
99%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
98%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
98%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
97%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
97%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
96%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
96%
#375
A10-7850K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#378
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
99%
#385
Pentium G4560
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($69) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W3565 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W3565A10-7850K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10-7850K ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($69 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W3565A10-7850K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3565 and A10-7850K

Intel

Xeon W3565

The Xeon W3565 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,391 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

A10-7850K

The A10-7850K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,394 points. Launch price was $173.

Processing Power

The Xeon W3565 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the A10-7850K's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3565 versus 4 GHz on the A10-7850K — a 14.5% clock advantage for the A10-7850K (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Xeon W3565 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the A10-7850K uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3565 scores 3,391 against the A10-7850K's 3,394 — a 0.1% lead for the A10-7850K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 513 vs 510, a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W3565 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3565 vs 0 kB on the A10-7850K.

FeatureXeon W3565A10-7850K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz
4 GHz+16%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz+16%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark
3,391
3,394
Geekbench 6 Single
513
510
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,726
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W3565 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the A10-7850K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The A10-7850K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 24 GB 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon W3565) vs 2 (A10-7850K). PCIe lanes: 36 (Xeon W3565) vs 16 (A10-7850K) — the Xeon W3565 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X58 (Xeon W3565) and A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A10-7850K).

FeatureXeon W3565A10-7850K
Socket
LGA1366
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
24 GB
32 GB+33%
RAM Channels
3+50%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
36+125%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon W3565) vs AMD-V (A10-7850K). The A10-7850K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon W3565 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7850K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7850K rivals Core i3-4340.

FeatureXeon W3565A10-7850K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget