
Xeon W3570 vs FX-9830P

Xeon W3570

FX-9830P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W3570 is positioned at rank 1011 and the FX-9830P is on rank 835, so the FX-9830P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3570
Performance Per Dollar FX-9830P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W3570 | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W3570 | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+197%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3570 and FX-9830P

Xeon W3570
The Xeon W3570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $480.

FX-9830P
The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Xeon W3570 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the FX-9830P's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3570 versus 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P — a 6.7% clock advantage for the FX-9830P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon W3570 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the FX-9830P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3570 scores 3,267 against the FX-9830P's 3,298 — a 0.9% lead for the FX-9830P.
| Feature | Xeon W3570 | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.46 GHz | 3.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per module)+300% |
| Process | 45 nm | 28 nm-38% |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,267 | 3,298 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W3570 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-9830P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon W3570 | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W3570 launched at $999 MSRP, while the FX-9830P debuted at $150. At current prices ($15 vs $45), the Xeon W3570 is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W3570 delivers 217.8 pts/$ vs 73.3 pts/$ for the FX-9830P — making the Xeon W3570 the 99.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W3570 | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $150-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-67% | $45 |
| Performance per Dollar | 217.8+197% | 73.3 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















