Xeon X3460
VS
A10-5800K

Xeon X3460 vs A10-5800K

Intel

Xeon X3460

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2009
VS
AMD

A10-5800K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X3460 is positioned at rank 886 and the A10-5800K is on rank 430, so the A10-5800K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3460

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
22227%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4197%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3729%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2880%
#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
100%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
99%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
99%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
99%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
97%
#503
Xeon W-3275M
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $4449
97%
#504
Xeon E5-2660 v3
MSRP: $1445|Avg: $150
96%
#505
Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $500
96%
#886
Xeon X3460
MSRP: $316|Avg: $25
100%
#893
Xeon E5502
MSRP: $188|Avg: $39
98%
#898
Xeon W-2225
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $150
96%
#900
Xeon E5-2650L v3
MSRP: $1329|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-5800K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6313%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5965%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4331%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1305%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1033%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
904%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
518%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
511%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
465%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
465%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
460%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
448%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
441%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
440%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
436%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
100%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
99%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
99%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
95%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
95%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
95%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
94%
#430
A10-5800K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
99%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
98%
#436
Ryzen 5 1500X
MSRP: $189|Avg: $67
97%
#444
Pentium G4560T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $20
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($25) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X3460 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X3460A10-5800K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10-5800K ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($25 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X3460A10-5800K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X3460 and A10-5800K

Intel

Xeon X3460

The Xeon X3460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,955 points. Launch price was $316.

AMD

A10-5800K

The A10-5800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,963 points. Launch price was $122.

Processing Power

The Xeon X3460 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the A10-5800K's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X3460 versus 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800K — a 19.3% clock advantage for the A10-5800K (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon X3460 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the A10-5800K uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X3460 scores 2,955 against the A10-5800K's 2,963 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-5800K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3460 vs 0 kB on the A10-5800K.

FeatureXeon X3460A10-5800K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz
4.2 GHz+21%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.8 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,955
2,963
Geekbench 6 Single
461
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X3460 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10-5800K uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X3460A10-5800K
Socket
LGA1156
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon X3460) / AMD-V (A10-5800K). The A10-5800K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Xeon X3460 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-5800K rivals Core i3-3225.

FeatureXeon X3460A10-5800K
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7660D
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget