Xeon X5272 vs Celeron J4025
Xeon X5272
Celeron J4025
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5272 is positioned at rank 1029 and the Celeron J4025 is on rank 537, so the Celeron J4025 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5272
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J4025
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon X5272 | Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($76) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon X5272 | Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($76) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5272 and Celeron J4025
Xeon X5272
The Xeon X5272 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $800.
Celeron J4025
The Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,450 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The Celeron J4025 is built on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon X5272 scores 1,451 against the Celeron J4025's 1,450 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon X5272. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5272 vs 4 MB on the Celeron J4025.
| Feature | Xeon X5272 | Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+70% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache+50% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | — | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) |
| PassMark | 1,451 | 1,450 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon X5272 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J4025 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2 on the Xeon X5272 versus 2400 on the Celeron J4025 — the Celeron J4025 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon X5272 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon X5272) vs 2 (Celeron J4025). PCIe lanes: 0 (Xeon X5272) vs 6 (Celeron J4025) — the Celeron J4025 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 5100,Intel 5400 (Xeon X5272) and BGA1090 (Celeron J4025).
| Feature | Xeon X5272 | Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA771 | FCBGA1090 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2 | 2400+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+1677721500% | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 6 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Celeron J4025 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Xeon X5272 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5272 targets Server. Direct competitor: Celeron J4025 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.
| Feature | Xeon X5272 | Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon X5272 and Celeron J4025
