PhasmophobiaFPS onAthlon MP 2400+&GeForce RTX 4090

Phasmophobia

VR support requires stronger hardware. The game also uses the CPU for voice recognition processing, adding a unique load.

Phasmophobia - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1440P
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
4K
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS

Performance Report

Phasmophobia

GeForce RTX 4090 + Athlon MP 2400+
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, performance runs at around 8 FPS. At 1440p, performance is around 8 FPS. At 4K, performance is around 8 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 167% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2060) for Phasmophobia. The Athlon MP 2400+ is 98% below minimum CPU requirement.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Athlon MP 2400+ sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649
Official Launch Price: $1599
Athlon MP 2400+:$20
Official Launch Price: $151

Combo price: $1669. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 8 FPS, equivalent to 0 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.005 fps/$0.005 fps/$0.005 fps/$0.005 fps/$
1440p0.005 fps/$0.005 fps/$0.005 fps/$0.005 fps/$
4k0.005 fps/$0.005 fps/$0.005 fps/$0.005 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Athlon MP 2400+|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p low, the Athlon MP 2400+ sets the ceiling at about 8 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 81 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 90% (FPS gap: 73 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Athlon MP 2400+ is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 90%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 87%
HighCPU Limits GPU 85%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 83%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 85%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 81%
HighCPU Limits GPU 79%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 76%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 76%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 71%
HighCPU Limits GPU 67%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 60%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Athlon MP 2400+ and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU79% - 98%
<>
GPU32% - 39%
<>
Medium
CPU79% - 98%
<>
GPU32% - 39%
<>
High
CPU51% - 77%
<>
GPU70% - 81%
<>
Ultra
CPU29% - 61%
<>
GPU85% - 94%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU34% - 40%
<>
Medium
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU34% - 40%
<>
High
CPU47% - 51%
<>
GPU71% - 83%
<>
Ultra
CPU25% - 36%
<>
GPU87% - 95%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU34% - 40%
<>
Medium
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU34% - 40%
<>
High
CPU47% - 51%
<>
GPU71% - 83%
<>
Ultra
CPU25% - 36%
<>
GPU87% - 95%
<>

Performance Summary

The Athlon MP 2400+ + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 25% and 98% and GPU utilization between 32% and 95%. Athlon MP 2400+ reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 60% at 1080p to 61% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 71% to 57%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) Ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 91% usage (87-95%), while the Athlon MP 2400+ stays at 30% (25-36%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 71% and GPU 60%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 57% and GPU 61%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 57% and GPU 61%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 45% (29-61%) and GPU 90% (85-94%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Athlon MP 2400+ remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Athlon MP 2400+ and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Phasmophobia Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Athlon MP 2400+
cpu icon
305
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-4590
RecommendedCore i5-10600
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 970
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2060

Your hardware is below minimum requirements. CPU is the limiting factor (98% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.

CPU

-98%vsrecommended

GPU

+167%vsrecommended

CPU

-98%vsminimum

GPU

+295%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 970
Processor: Core i5-4590
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 21 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2060
Processor: Core i5-10600
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 21 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Athlon MP 2400+ and GeForce RTX 4090 run Phasmophobia well?

The Athlon MP 2400+ and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Phasmophobia at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 8 FPS which is classified as "struggling". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Phasmophobia?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1669 ($20 CPU + $1649 GPU). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Xeon Platinum 8454H is a great upgrade option for around $6540 (Rank #1 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Phasmophobia performance?

For Phasmophobia, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Athlon MP 2400+ is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Phasmophobia?

Phasmophobia does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Phasmophobia?

Phasmophobia requires at minimum a Core i5-4590 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 970 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 21 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600 and GeForce RTX 2060 with 8 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.

6How accurate are these Phasmophobia FPS estimates for the Athlon MP 2400+ and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Phasmophobia FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.