VR support requires stronger hardware. The game also uses the CPU for voice recognition processing, adding a unique load.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 331 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 269 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 155 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 167% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2060) for Phasmophobia. The Core i3-13100E is 22% below recommended, but 4% above minimum.
At lower resolutions (1080p (low/medium), 1440p low), the Core i3-13100E sets the FPS ceiling. As graphical load increases at (1080p ultra, 1440p (high/ultra), all 4k settings), the GeForce RTX 4090 becomes the FPS-limiting side. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p high, 1440p medium.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $1799. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 331 FPS, equivalent to 0.18 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.191 fps/$ | 0.191 fps/$ | 0.191 fps/$ | 0.184 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.191 fps/$ | 0.191 fps/$ | 0.191 fps/$ | 0.150 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.131 fps/$ | 0.134 fps/$ | 0.108 fps/$ | 0.086 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k medium, the GeForce RTX 4090 sets the ceiling at about 176 FPS, while the Core i3-13100E has headroom up to 241 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 27% (FPS gap: 65 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 7/12 cells, CPU limits 3/12, balanced 2/12.
Your GeForce RTX 4090 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Core i3-13100E frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 22% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | Balanced | GPU Limits CPU 16% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 11% | Balanced | GPU Limits CPU 13% | GPU Limits CPU 14% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | GPU Limits CPU 24% | GPU Limits CPU 27% | GPU Limits CPU 27% | GPU Limits CPU 25% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU25% - 46% <> GPU44% - 81% <> | CPU25% - 46% <> GPU44% - 81% <> | CPU20% - 48% <> GPU82% - 100% <> | CPU25% - 56% <> GPU90% - 99% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU24% - 35% <> GPU48% - 83% <> | CPU24% - 35% <> GPU48% - 83% <> | CPU16% - 27% <> GPU89% - 100% <> | CPU13% - 31% <> GPU94% - 97% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU24% - 35% <> GPU48% - 83% <> | CPU24% - 35% <> GPU48% - 83% <> | CPU16% - 28% <> GPU90% - 100% <> | CPU14% - 33% <> GPU100% - 100% |
The Core i3-13100E + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 13% and 56% and GPU utilization between 44% and 100%. Core i3-13100E keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 77% at 1080p to 82% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 37% to 27%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 100% usage (100-100%), while the Core i3-13100E stays at 24% (14-33%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 37% and GPU 77%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 26% and GPU 81%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 27% and GPU 82%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 34% (20-48%) and GPU 91% (82-100%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i3-13100E remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 100% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra while the Core i3-13100E still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 22% below recommended and your GPU is 167% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.
-22%vsrecommended
+167%vsrecommended
+4%vsminimum
+295%vsminimum
Yes, the Core i3-13100E paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Phasmophobia smoothly up to 4k achieving around 155 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 167% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 22% below the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1799 ($150 CPU (Rank #206 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your GeForce RTX 4090 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end card with a significantly better value rating.
Your GeForce RTX 4090 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Phasmophobia performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 1080p ultra, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1440p low.
Phasmophobia does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Phasmophobia requires at minimum a Core i5-4590 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 970 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 21 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600 and GeForce RTX 2060 with 8 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.
These Phasmophobia FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
