PhasmophobiaFPS onCore i5-7500T&GeForce RTX 4090

Phasmophobia

VR support requires stronger hardware. The game also uses the CPU for voice recognition processing, adding a unique load.

Phasmophobia - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low130 FPS
medium130 FPS
high130 FPS
ultra118 FPS
1440P
low130 FPS
medium130 FPS
high130 FPS
ultra94 FPS
4K
low85 FPS
medium79 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra44 FPS

Performance Report

Phasmophobia

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i5-7500T
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 118 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 94 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 44 to 85 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 167% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2060) for Phasmophobia. The Core i5-7500T is 60% below minimum CPU requirement.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Core i5-7500T sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i5-7500T:$130(updated 2/10/2026)
Official Launch Price: $202

Combo price: $1779. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 118 FPS, equivalent to 0.07 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.073 fps/$0.073 fps/$0.073 fps/$0.066 fps/$
1440p0.073 fps/$0.073 fps/$0.073 fps/$0.053 fps/$
4k0.048 fps/$0.044 fps/$0.033 fps/$0.025 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i5-7500T|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p low, the Core i5-7500T sets the ceiling at about 130 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 441 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 71% (FPS gap: 311 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Core i5-7500T is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 71%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 66%
HighCPU Limits GPU 61%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 61%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 68%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 64%
HighCPU Limits GPU 59%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 65%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 56%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 58%
HighCPU Limits GPU 62%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 69%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i5-7500T and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU41% - 57%
<>
GPU38% - 60%
<>
Medium
CPU41% - 57%
<>
GPU38% - 60%
<>
High
CPU31% - 56%
<>
GPU77% - 90%
<>
Ultra
CPU25% - 58%
<>
GPU89% - 97%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU40% - 48%
<>
GPU42% - 61%
<>
Medium
CPU40% - 48%
<>
GPU42% - 61%
<>
High
CPU28% - 38%
<>
GPU85% - 92%
<>
Ultra
CPU21% - 39%
<>
GPU97% - 99%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU40% - 48%
<>
GPU42% - 62%
<>
Medium
CPU40% - 48%
<>
GPU42% - 62%
<>
High
CPU28% - 39%
<>
GPU86% - 94%
<>
Ultra
CPU22% - 41%
<>
GPU97% - 100%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i5-7500T + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 21% and 58% and GPU utilization between 38% and 100%. Core i5-7500T keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 69% at 1080p to 73% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 46% to 39%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) Ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 98% usage (97-99%), while the Core i5-7500T stays at 30% (21-39%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 46% and GPU 69%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 38% and GPU 73%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 39% and GPU 73%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 33% (28-38%) and GPU 88% (85-92%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i5-7500T remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 98% average load at 1440p (2K QHD) Ultra while the Core i5-7500T still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Phasmophobia Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i5-7500T
cpu icon
5,215
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-4590
RecommendedCore i5-10600
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 970
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2060

Your hardware is below minimum requirements. CPU is the limiting factor (60% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.

CPU

-71%vsrecommended

GPU

+167%vsrecommended

CPU

-60%vsminimum

GPU

+295%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 970
Processor: Core i5-4590
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 21 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2060
Processor: Core i5-10600
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 21 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i5-7500T and GeForce RTX 4090 run Phasmophobia well?

Yes, the Core i5-7500T paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Phasmophobia smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 94 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 167% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 71% below the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Phasmophobia?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1779 ($130 CPU + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Phasmophobia performance?

For Phasmophobia, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i5-7500T is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Phasmophobia?

Phasmophobia does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Phasmophobia?

Phasmophobia requires at minimum a Core i5-4590 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 970 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 21 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600 and GeForce RTX 2060 with 8 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.

6How accurate are these Phasmophobia FPS estimates for the Core i5-7500T and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Phasmophobia FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.