Optimized to run on laptops, it is largely CPU-limited by the simulation. Installing many DLCs and expansions significantly increases RAM and storage load.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 264 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 310 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 218 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 2070% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 650) for The Sims 4. The EPYC 9255 is 518% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-4460).
At lower resolutions (1080p (low/medium/high)), the EPYC 9255 sets the FPS ceiling. As graphical load increases at (1440p ultra), the GeForce RTX 4090 becomes the FPS-limiting side. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p ultra, 1440p (low/medium/high), all 4k settings.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $3583. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 264 FPS, equivalent to 0.07 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.102 fps/$ | 0.088 fps/$ | 0.080 fps/$ | 0.074 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.111 fps/$ | 0.107 fps/$ | 0.097 fps/$ | 0.087 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.088 fps/$ | 0.086 fps/$ | 0.077 fps/$ | 0.061 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p medium, the EPYC 9255 sets the ceiling at about 321 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 356 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 10% (FPS gap: 35 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 3/12 cells, GPU limits 1/12, balanced 8/12.
The EPYC 9255 and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 7% | CPU Limits GPU 10% | CPU Limits GPU 10% | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | GPU Limits CPU 8% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU0% - 7% <> GPU10% - 26% <> | CPU0% - 7% <> GPU10% - 26% <> | CPU0% - 7% <> GPU10% - 26% <> | CPU0% - 7% <> GPU10% - 26% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU0% - 6% <> GPU11% - 28% <> | CPU0% - 6% <> GPU11% - 28% <> | CPU0% - 6% <> GPU11% - 28% <> | CPU0% - 6% <> GPU11% - 28% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU0% - 6% <> GPU11% - 28% <> | CPU0% - 6% <> GPU11% - 28% <> | CPU0% - 6% <> GPU11% - 28% <> | CPU0% - 6% <> GPU11% - 28% <> |
The EPYC 9255 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 0% and 7% and GPU utilization between 10% and 28%. EPYC 9255 keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 18% at 1080p to 20% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 4% to 3%.
Neither component is close to saturation: CPU tops out at 7% and GPU at 28%. This pattern suggests possible engine-side limits, an FPS cap, or workload constraints unrelated to raw hardware throughput. It also shows why low utilization does not automatically mean there is no FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 4% and GPU 18%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 3% and GPU 20%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 3% and GPU 20%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.
1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 3% (0-6%) and GPU 20% (11-28%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 9255 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 9255 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 518% above and your GPU is 2070% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+518%vsrecommended
+2070%vsrecommended
+1083%vsminimum
+81%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 9255 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run The Sims 4 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 218 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 2070% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 518% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $3583 ($1934 CPU (Rank #300 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 9255 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 9455P is a great upgrade option for around $4819 (Rank #344 for value).
Your EPYC 9255 is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your The Sims 4 performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high. GPU fully utilized at: 1440p ultra.
The Sims 4 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
The Sims 4 requires at minimum a Core i3-3220 (CPU) and GeForce 6600 (GPU) with 4 GB RAM and 25 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-4460 and GeForce GTX 650 with 8 GB RAM. Your EPYC 9255 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These The Sims 4 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
