PhasmophobiaFPS onRyzen 5 PRO 3400G&GeForce RTX 4090

Phasmophobia

VR support requires stronger hardware. The game also uses the CPU for voice recognition processing, adding a unique load.

Phasmophobia - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low79 FPS
medium62 FPS
high52 FPS
ultra42 FPS
1440P
low53 FPS
medium43 FPS
high39 FPS
ultra30 FPS
4K
low37 FPS
medium32 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra22 FPS

Performance Report

Phasmophobia

GeForce RTX 4090 + Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, frame rates range from 42 to 79 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 30 to 53 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 22 to 37 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 167% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2060) for Phasmophobia. The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is 31% below minimum CPU requirement.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4090 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G still has additional frame-generation headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649
Official Launch Price: $1599
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G:$80
Official Launch Price: $149

Combo price: $1729. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 42 FPS, equivalent to 0.02 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.046 fps/$0.036 fps/$0.030 fps/$0.024 fps/$
1440p0.031 fps/$0.025 fps/$0.023 fps/$0.017 fps/$
4k0.021 fps/$0.019 fps/$0.016 fps/$0.013 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 sets the ceiling at about 20 FPS, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has headroom up to 175 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 89% (FPS gap: 155 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your GeForce RTX 4090 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 64%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 73%
HighGPU Limits CPU 77%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 79%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 76%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 81%
HighGPU Limits CPU 83%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 85%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 85%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 88%
HighGPU Limits CPU 88%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 89%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU79% - 98%
<>
GPU32% - 39%
<>
Medium
CPU79% - 98%
<>
GPU32% - 39%
<>
High
CPU51% - 77%
<>
GPU70% - 81%
<>
Ultra
CPU29% - 61%
<>
GPU85% - 94%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU34% - 40%
<>
Medium
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU34% - 40%
<>
High
CPU47% - 51%
<>
GPU71% - 83%
<>
Ultra
CPU25% - 36%
<>
GPU87% - 95%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU34% - 40%
<>
Medium
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU34% - 40%
<>
High
CPU47% - 51%
<>
GPU71% - 83%
<>
Ultra
CPU25% - 36%
<>
GPU87% - 95%
<>

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 25% and 98% and GPU utilization between 32% and 95%. Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 60% at 1080p to 61% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 71% to 57%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) Ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 91% usage (87-95%), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G stays at 30% (25-36%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 71% and GPU 60%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 57% and GPU 61%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 57% and GPU 61%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 45% (29-61%) and GPU 90% (85-94%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Phasmophobia Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
cpu icon
9,056
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-4590
RecommendedCore i5-10600
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 970
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2060

Your hardware is below minimum requirements. CPU is the limiting factor (31% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.

CPU

-49%vsrecommended

GPU

+167%vsrecommended

CPU

-31%vsminimum

GPU

+295%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 970
Processor: Core i5-4590
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 21 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2060
Processor: Core i5-10600
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 21 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and GeForce RTX 4090 run Phasmophobia well?

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Phasmophobia at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 42 FPS which is classified as "playable". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Phasmophobia?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1729 ($80 CPU + $1649 GPU). Your GeForce RTX 4090 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end card with a significantly better value rating.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Phasmophobia performance?

Your GeForce RTX 4090 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Phasmophobia performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Phasmophobia?

Phasmophobia does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Phasmophobia?

Phasmophobia requires at minimum a Core i5-4590 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 970 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 21 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600 and GeForce RTX 2060 with 8 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.

6How accurate are these Phasmophobia FPS estimates for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Phasmophobia FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.