VR support requires stronger hardware. The game also uses the CPU for voice recognition processing, adding a unique load.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 92 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 68 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 52 to 73 FPS.
The Quadro GP100 is 4% below recommended, but 42% above minimum for Phasmophobia. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 94% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-10600).
The Quadro GP100 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $1719. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 92 FPS, equivalent to 0.05 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.081 fps/$ | 0.072 fps/$ | 0.061 fps/$ | 0.054 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.054 fps/$ | 0.050 fps/$ | 0.046 fps/$ | 0.040 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.042 fps/$ | 0.042 fps/$ | 0.034 fps/$ | 0.030 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1440p ultra, the Quadro GP100 sets the ceiling at about 63 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 348 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 82% (FPS gap: 285 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Quadro GP100 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | GPU Limits CPU 67% | GPU Limits CPU 71% | GPU Limits CPU 73% | GPU Limits CPU 75% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | GPU Limits CPU 78% | GPU Limits CPU 80% | GPU Limits CPU 80% | GPU Limits CPU 82% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | GPU Limits CPU 75% | GPU Limits CPU 76% | GPU Limits CPU 77% | GPU Limits CPU 78% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU36% - 58% <> GPU31% - 60% <> | CPU36% - 58% <> GPU31% - 60% <> | CPU36% - 58% <> GPU37% - 65% <> | CPU29% - 47% <> GPU44% - 71% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU27% - 35% <> GPU31% - 61% <> | CPU27% - 35% <> GPU31% - 61% <> | CPU27% - 35% <> GPU37% - 65% <> | CPU15% - 22% <> GPU41% - 68% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU27% - 37% <> GPU31% - 61% <> | CPU27% - 37% <> GPU31% - 61% <> | CPU27% - 37% <> GPU37% - 66% <> | CPU16% - 24% <> GPU46% - 76% <> |
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Quadro GP100 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 15% and 58% and GPU utilization between 31% and 76%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while Quadro GP100 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 50% at 1080p to 51% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 45% to 29%.
The utilization pattern is relatively even. The Quadro GP100 reaches 61% average at its highest-load preset, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D peaks at 47% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 45% and GPU 50%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 28% and GPU 49%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 29% and GPU 51%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
4K (Ultra HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 20% (16-24%) and GPU 61% (46-76%), which keeps Quadro GP100 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro GP100 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 94% below recommended and your GPU is 4% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.
+94%vsrecommended
-4%vsrecommended
+161%vsminimum
+42%vsminimum
Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Quadro GP100 can run Phasmophobia smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 68 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 4% below the recommended specs, and your CPU is 94% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1719 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $1335 GPU (Rank #114 Value)). Your Quadro GP100 is currently the main performance bottleneck and its market value ($1335) is actually higher than newer, faster alternatives. Trading it or upgrading could yield immediate profit and performance gains. For example, upgrading to the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) for around $900 (Rank #11 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance while costing less than your current GPU.
For Phasmophobia, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Quadro GP100 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Phasmophobia does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Phasmophobia requires at minimum a Core i5-4590 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 970 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 21 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600 and GeForce RTX 2060 with 8 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.
These Phasmophobia FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
