VR support requires stronger hardware. The game also uses the CPU for voice recognition processing, adding a unique load.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 270 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 228 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 142 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 167% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2060) for Phasmophobia. The Ryzen 7 7840U is 39% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-10600).
The GeForce RTX 4090 determines the performance ceiling at all 4k settings, executing at maximum capacity. The system is well balanced at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings.
At 4k medium, the GeForce RTX 4090 sets the ceiling at about 169 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7840U has headroom up to 215 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 21% (FPS gap: 46 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 4/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 8/12.
The Ryzen 7 7840U and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | GPU Limits CPU 20% | GPU Limits CPU 21% | GPU Limits CPU 20% | GPU Limits CPU 18% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU0% - 22% <> GPU47% - 86% <> | CPU0% - 22% <> GPU47% - 86% <> | CPU16% - 41% <> GPU79% - 99% <> | CPU25% - 48% <> GPU87% - 97% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU0% - 8% <> GPU50% - 86% <> | CPU0% - 8% <> GPU50% - 86% <> | CPU5% - 18% <> GPU86% - 99% <> | CPU6% - 21% <> GPU91% - 94% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU0% - 9% <> GPU50% - 87% <> | CPU0% - 9% <> GPU50% - 87% <> | CPU5% - 20% <> GPU88% - 100% <> | CPU7% - 23% <> GPU99% - 100% <> |
The Ryzen 7 7840U + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 0% and 48% and GPU utilization between 47% and 100%. Ryzen 7 7840U keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 becomes the primary limiter at high visual load. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 78% at 1080p to 83% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 22% to 9%.
This profile is GPU-bound. At 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 100% usage (99-100%), while the Ryzen 7 7840U stays at 15% (7-23%), indicating the graphics pipeline is the limiting stage.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 22% and GPU 78%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 9% and GPU 80%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 9% and GPU 83%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 28% (16-41%) and GPU 89% (79-99%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7840U remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 100% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra while the Ryzen 7 7840U still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization & Bottlenecks: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. This is the key to identifying performance bottlenecks in any system.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 39% above and your GPU is 167% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.
+39%vsrecommended
+167%vsrecommended
+87%vsminimum
+295%vsminimum
Yes, the Ryzen 7 7840U paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Phasmophobia smoothly up to 4k achieving around 142 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 167% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 39% above the recommended requirements.
Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.
Your GeForce RTX 4090 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Phasmophobia performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Phasmophobia does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Phasmophobia requires at minimum a Core i5-4590 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 970 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 21 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600 and GeForce RTX 2060 with 8 GB RAM. Your Ryzen 7 7840U and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Phasmophobia FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
