Optimized to run on laptops, it is largely CPU-limited by the simulation. Installing many DLCs and expansions significantly increases RAM and storage load.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 208 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 203 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 125 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 2070% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 650) for The Sims 4. The Xeon Gold 6242R is 194% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-4460).
The Xeon Gold 6242R sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $2428. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 208 FPS, equivalent to 0.09 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.121 fps/$ | 0.103 fps/$ | 0.091 fps/$ | 0.086 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.126 fps/$ | 0.114 fps/$ | 0.098 fps/$ | 0.084 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.079 fps/$ | 0.072 fps/$ | 0.063 fps/$ | 0.051 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k ultra, the Xeon Gold 6242R sets the ceiling at about 121 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 190 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 36% (FPS gap: 69 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Xeon Gold 6242R is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 19% | CPU Limits GPU 21% | CPU Limits GPU 23% | CPU Limits GPU 19% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 16% | CPU Limits GPU 19% | CPU Limits GPU 20% | CPU Limits GPU 20% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 31% | CPU Limits GPU 34% | CPU Limits GPU 35% | CPU Limits GPU 36% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU17% - 27% <> GPU0% - 22% <> | CPU17% - 27% <> GPU0% - 22% <> | CPU17% - 27% <> GPU0% - 22% <> | CPU17% - 27% <> GPU0% - 22% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU15% - 24% <> GPU0% - 22% <> | CPU15% - 24% <> GPU0% - 22% <> | CPU15% - 24% <> GPU0% - 22% <> | CPU15% - 24% <> GPU0% - 22% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU15% - 24% <> GPU0% - 22% <> | CPU15% - 24% <> GPU0% - 22% <> | CPU15% - 24% <> GPU0% - 22% <> | CPU15% - 24% <> GPU0% - 22% <> |
The Xeon Gold 6242R + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 15% and 27% and GPU utilization between 0% and 22%. Xeon Gold 6242R keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 11% at 1080p to 11% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 22% to 20%.
Neither component is close to saturation: CPU tops out at 27% and GPU at 22%. This pattern suggests possible engine-side limits, an FPS cap, or workload constraints unrelated to raw hardware throughput. It also shows why low utilization does not automatically mean there is no FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 22% and GPU 11%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 20% and GPU 11%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 20% and GPU 11%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.
1080p (Full HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 22% (17-27%) and GPU 11% (0-22%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Xeon Gold 6242R remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Xeon Gold 6242R and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 194% above and your GPU is 2070% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+194%vsrecommended
+2070%vsrecommended
+462%vsminimum
+81%vsminimum
Yes, the Xeon Gold 6242R paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run The Sims 4 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 125 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 2070% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 194% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2428 ($779 CPU (Rank #460 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your Xeon Gold 6242R provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the Xeon Platinum 8571N is a great upgrade option for around $599 (Rank #60 for value) while costing less than your current CPU.
Your Xeon Gold 6242R is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your The Sims 4 performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
The Sims 4 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
The Sims 4 requires at minimum a Core i3-3220 (CPU) and GeForce 6600 (GPU) with 4 GB RAM and 25 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-4460 and GeForce GTX 650 with 8 GB RAM. Your Xeon Gold 6242R and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These The Sims 4 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
