A10-6790K vs Core i3-6167U

A10-6790K vs Core i3-6167U Performance Spectrum

A10-6790K

4 / 4

3,112

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-6167U

2 / 4

3,128

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6790K vs Core i3-6167U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6790K vs Core i3-6167U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6790K

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Core i3-6167U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-6167U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,112 vs 3,128).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 100W vs 28W.

Core i3-6167U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 100W, a 72W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6790K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6790K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6790K.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-6167U better than A10-6790K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-6790K is ahead with a 11.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6167U pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6167U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-6167U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-6167U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6167U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-6790K vs Core i3-6167U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6790K

The A10-6790K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,112 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-6167U

The Core i3-6167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,128 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6790K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6167U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6790K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790K versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6167U — a 45.7% clock advantage for the A10-6790K (base: 4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A10-6790K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6167U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6790K scores 3,112 against the Core i3-6167U's 3,128 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-6167U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6790K vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6167U.

Feature	A10-6790K	Core i3-6167U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+59%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+48%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,112	3,128
Geekbench 6 Single	412	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6790K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-6167U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-6790K	Core i3-6167U
Socket	FM2	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6790K) / not specified (Core i3-6167U). The A10-6790K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Core i3-6167U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6790K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6790K rivals Core i3-4340.