A10-7700K vs Core i3-10110Y

A10-7700K vs Core i3-10110Y Performance Spectrum

A10-7700K

4 / 4

3,182

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-10110Y

2 / 4

3,171

0.0%

Pentium Dual Core T2390

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7700K vs Core i3-10110Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7700K vs Core i3-10110Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7700K

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core i3-10110Y needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-10110Y.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $152 MSRP, while Core i3-10110Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-10110Y

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,171 vs 3,182).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7700K.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7700K better than Core i3-10110Y?

Yes. A10-7700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7700K is the better buy right now. A10-7700K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $152 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible UTFCBGA1377 setup, Core i3-10110Y can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10110Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-7700K vs Core i3-10110Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7700K

The A10-7700K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,182 points. Launch price was $152.

Core i3-10110Y

The Core i3-10110Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,171 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7700K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-10110Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-7700K versus 4 GHz on the Core i3-10110Y — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-10110Y (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1 GHz). The A10-7700K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-10110Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7700K scores 3,182 against the Core i3-10110Y's 3,171 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-7700K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7700K vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-10110Y.

Feature	A10-7700K	Core i3-10110Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4 GHz+5%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+250%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Comet Lake-Y (2019)
PassMark	3,182	3,171
Geekbench 6 Single	442	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7700K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10110Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-7700K	Core i3-10110Y
Socket	FM2+	UTFCBGA1377
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7700K) / not specified (Core i3-10110Y). The A10-7700K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i3-10110Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7700K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7700K rivals Core i3-4360.