Radeon R7 A10-7700K vs Quadro FX 770M

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 770M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 A10-7700K vs Quadro FX 770M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 A10-7700K vs Quadro FX 770M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 A10-7700K vs Quadro FX 770M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

2023

Why buy it

  • 246.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($152 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 100W instead of 189W, a 89W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro FX 770M

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-7700K across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $152 MSRP).
  • 89% higher power demand at 189W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 A10-7700K is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 246.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 262.4% in PassMark G3D (772 vs 213), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 A10-7700K is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 55nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A10-7700K makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon R7 A10-7700K vs Quadro FX 770M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 772 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 770M

The Quadro FX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 213 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 A10-7700K scores 772 versus the Quadro FX 770M's 213 — the Radeon R7 A10-7700K leads by 262.4%. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro FX 770M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 240 (Quadro FX 770M). Raw compute: 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 770M).

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7700KQuadro FX 770M
G3D Mark Score
772+262%
213
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
6 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
2048+753%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
20.48 TFLOPS+3192%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+60%
80
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7700KQuadro FX 770M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-7700K and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 770M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 770M) — the Radeon R7 A10-7700K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7700KQuadro FX 770M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-7700K draws 100W versus the Quadro FX 770M's 189W — a 61.6% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 350W (Quadro FX 770M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7700KQuadro FX 770M
TDP
100W-47%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
7.7+600%
1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-7700K (2023 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7700KQuadro FX 770M
MSRP
$152
Codename
Navi 33
GT200B
Release
January 4 2023
November 11 2008
Ranking
#140
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.