GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs Quadro FX 770M

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 770M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs Quadro FX 770M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs Quadro FX 770M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs Quadro FX 770M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

2013

Why buy it

  • 1.7% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 32.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 770M

2008

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 189W instead of 250W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7800 GTX across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 7800 GTX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.7% in average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 770M instead at 213 vs 210, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 7800 GTX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7800 GTX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs Quadro FX 770M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 770M

The Quadro FX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 213 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX scores 210 and the Quadro FX 770M reaches 213 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 770M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 240 (Quadro FX 770M). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 770M).

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXQuadro FX 770M
G3D Mark Score
210
213+1%
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
2880+1100%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.345 TFLOPS+759%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
240+200%
80
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+500%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 770M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXQuadro FX 770M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 770M carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 770M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7800 GTX and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 770M. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 770M) — the GeForce Go 7800 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXQuadro FX 770M
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+500%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX draws 250W versus the Quadro FX 770M's 189W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 350W (Quadro FX 770M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXQuadro FX 770M
TDP
250W
189W-24%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
0.8
1.1+38%