GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs GeForce GT 240M
GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 240M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is positioned at rank 179 and the GeForce GT 240M is on rank 392, so the GeForce Go 7800 GTX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 240M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 240M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (1 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7800 GTX.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 240M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 240M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7800 GTX and GeForce GT 240M
GeForce Go 7800 GTX
The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $699.
GeForce GT 240M
The GeForce GT 240M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 7800 GTX scores 210 and the GeForce GT 240M reaches 212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 240M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 384 (GeForce GT 240M). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240M). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 240M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 210 | 212 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+650% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.345 TFLOPS+1014% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 928 MHz+44% | 645 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+650% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+650% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 240M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7800 GTX comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 240M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 240M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 240M) — the GeForce Go 7800 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 240M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 1 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 240M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 240M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.1 (10_1)+23% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs None (GeForce GT 240M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 240M).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 240M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo | PureVideo HD (VP4) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7800 GTX draws 250W versus the GeForce GT 240M's 32W — a 154.6% difference. The GeForce GT 240M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 350W (GeForce GT 240M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 240M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 32W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 6.6+725% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 7800 GTX and GeForce GT 240M
