GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs Quadro FX 1700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs Quadro FX 1700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs Quadro FX 1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

2013

Why buy it

  • 2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 32.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 1700

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 189W instead of 250W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7800 GTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 7800 GTX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 1700 instead at 216 vs 210, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 7800 GTX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 1700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 1700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 7800 GTX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs Quadro FX 1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX scores 210 and the Quadro FX 1700 reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 1700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700).

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXQuadro FX 1700
G3D Mark Score
210
216+3%
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
2880+1100%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.345 TFLOPS+759%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
240+200%
80
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+500%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXQuadro FX 1700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1700 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 1700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7800 GTX and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 1700) — the GeForce Go 7800 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXQuadro FX 1700
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+500%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXQuadro FX 1700
DirectX
9.0c
10_0+11%
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX draws 250W versus the Quadro FX 1700's 189W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 1700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXQuadro FX 1700
TDP
250W
189W-24%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
0.8
1.1+38%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 7800 GTX (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXQuadro FX 1700
MSRP
$699
Codename
GK110B
GT200B
Release
November 7 2013
November 11 2008
Ranking
#278
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.