
GeForce Go 7800 GTX

GeForce GT 230M
GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs GeForce GT 230M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs GeForce GT 230M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs GeForce GT 230M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 7800 GTX
2013Why buy it
- ✅8.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.
GeForce GT 230M
2017Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7800 GTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs GeForce GT 230M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX
The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce GT 230M
The GeForce GT 230M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 7800 GTX scores 210 and the GeForce GT 230M reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 230M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 384 (GeForce GT 230M). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 230M). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 230M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 210 | 216+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+650% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.345 TFLOPS+374% | 1.127 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 928 MHz | 1468 MHz+58% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+900% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+67% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 230M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7800 GTX has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 230M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 230M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7800 GTX and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 230M. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 230M) — the GeForce Go 7800 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 230M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 1 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 230M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 230M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.1+12% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs No (GeForce GT 230M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 230M).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 230M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7800 GTX draws 250W versus the GeForce GT 230M's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce GT 230M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 350W (GeForce GT 230M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 GTX | GeForce GT 230M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 30W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 7.2+800% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













