GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs GeForce GT 230M

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs GeForce GT 230M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs GeForce GT 230M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs GeForce GT 230M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

2013

Why buy it

  • 8.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.

GeForce GT 230M

2017

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7800 GTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 7800 GTX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 230M instead at 216 vs 210, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 7800 GTX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 230M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 230M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 7800 GTX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs GeForce GT 230M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230M

The GeForce GT 230M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX scores 210 and the GeForce GT 230M reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 230M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 384 (GeForce GT 230M). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 230M). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXGeForce GT 230M
G3D Mark Score
210
216+3%
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2880+650%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.345 TFLOPS+374%
1.127 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1468 MHz+58%
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
240+900%
24
L1 Cache
240 KB+67%
144 KB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+200%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXGeForce GT 230M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 230M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 230M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7800 GTX and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 230M. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 230M) — the GeForce Go 7800 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXGeForce GT 230M
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
1 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+200%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 230M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXGeForce GT 230M
DirectX
9.0c
10.1+12%
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
2.1
3.3+57%
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs No (GeForce GT 230M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 230M).

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXGeForce GT 230M
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX draws 250W versus the GeForce GT 230M's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce GT 230M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) vs 350W (GeForce GT 230M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce Go 7800 GTXGeForce GT 230M
TDP
250W
30W-88%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
0.8
7.2+800%