A10-7700K vs Core i3-4350T

CPU

GPU

A10-7700K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-4350T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A10-7700K vs Core i3-4350T Performance Spectrum

A10-7700K

4 / 4

3,182

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4350T

2 / 4

3,142

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7700K vs Core i3-4350T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7700K vs Core i3-4350T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7700K

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-4350T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($152 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Core i3-4350T

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $152 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.8 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $152 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,142 vs 3,182).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7700K.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7700K better than Core i3-4350T?

Yes. A10-7700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7700K is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-7700K comes in 10.1% more expensive on MSRP at $152 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4350T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 8.8% better value on paper (22.8 vs 20.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-7700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7700K vs Core i3-4350T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7700K

The A10-7700K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,182 points. Launch price was $152.

Core i3-4350T

The Core i3-4350T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $138.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7700K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4350T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-7700K versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4350T — a 20.3% clock advantage for the A10-7700K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The A10-7700K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4350T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7700K scores 3,182 against the Core i3-4350T's 3,142 — a 1.3% lead for the A10-7700K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7700K vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4350T.

Feature	A10-7700K	Core i3-4350T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+23%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+13%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,182+1%	3,142
Geekbench 6 Single	442	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7700K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4350T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-7700K versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4350T — the A10-7700K supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A10-7700K	Core i3-4350T
Socket	FM2+	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+33%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-7700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4350T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-7700K) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4350T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7700K targets Budget, Core i3-4350T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-7700K rivals Core i3-4360.

Feature	A10-7700K	Core i3-4350T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R7	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-7700K was priced at $152, while the Core i3-4350T came in at $138. On launch pricing ($152 vs $138), Core i3-4350T was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-7700K delivers 20.9 pts/$ vs 22.8 pts/$ for the Core i3-4350T — making the Core i3-4350T the 8.4% better value option.

Feature	A10-7700K	Core i3-4350T
MSRP	$152	$138-9%
Performance per Dollar	20.9	22.8+9%
Release Date	2014	2014

Search A10-7700K on Amazon

Search Core i3-4350T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.