A10-7700K vs Core i7-5557U

AMD

A10-7700K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-5557U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

A10-7700K vs Core i7-5557U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7700K vs Core i7-5557U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7700K vs Core i7-5557U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7700K

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core i7-5557U needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-5557U.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $152 MSRP, while Core i7-5557U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-5557U

2015

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (3,153 vs 3,182).
    • 438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
    • No integrated graphics, while A10-7700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7700K.

    Quick Answers

    So, is A10-7700K better than Core i7-5557U?
    Yes. A10-7700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, A10-7700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    A10-7700K is the better buy right now. A10-7700K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $152 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i7-5557U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    A10-7700K vs Core i7-5557U Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    A10-7700K

    The A10-7700K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,182 points. Launch price was $152.

    Intel

    Core i7-5557U

    The Core i7-5557U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,153 points. Launch price was $426.

    Processing Power

    The A10-7700K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-5557U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-7700K versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-5557U — a 11.1% clock advantage for the A10-7700K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The A10-7700K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-5557U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7700K scores 3,182 against the Core i7-5557U's 3,153 — a 0.9% lead for the A10-7700K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7700K vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-5557U.

    FeatureA10-7700KCore i7-5557U
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    3.8 GHz+12%
    3.4 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.5 GHz+13%
    3.1 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    4096 kB+1500%
    256K (per core)
    Process
    28 nm
    14 nm-50%
    Architecture
    Godaveri (2014−2016)
    Broadwell-U (2015)
    PassMark
    3,182
    3,153
    Geekbench 6 Single
    442
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The A10-7700K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-5557U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureA10-7700KCore i7-5557U
    Socket
    FM2+
    FCBGA1168
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-2133
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7700K) / not specified (Core i7-5557U). The A10-7700K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i7-5557U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7700K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7700K rivals Core i3-4360.

    FeatureA10-7700KCore i7-5557U
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon R7
    Unlocked
    Yes
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Budget