
A10-7700K

Core i7-9700K
A10-7700K vs Core i7-9700K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-7700K vs Core i7-9700K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-7700K vs Core i7-9700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-7700K
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $233 less on MSRP ($152 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,182 vs 14,397).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($152 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +217.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 78.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $152 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌153.3% HIGHER MSRP$385 MSRPvs$152 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7700K.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than A10-7700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-7700K vs Core i7-9700K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7700K
The A10-7700K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,182 points. Launch price was $152.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.
Processing Power
The A10-7700K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-7700K versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 25.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A10-7700K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7700K scores 3,182 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 127.6% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7700K vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.
| Feature | A10-7700K | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+1500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,182 | 14,397+352% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 442 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-7700K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-7700K versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K — the Core i7-9700K supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-7700K) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).
| Feature | A10-7700K | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-7700K) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7700K targets Budget, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-7700K rivals Core i3-4360.
| Feature | A10-7700K | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A10-7700K was priced at $152, while the Core i7-9700K came in at $385. On launch pricing ($152 vs $385), A10-7700K was $233 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-7700K delivers 20.9 pts/$ vs 37.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Core i7-9700K the 56.4% better value option.
| Feature | A10-7700K | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $152-61% | $385 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.9 | 37.4+79% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















