A4-1200
VS
Atom x5-Z8500

A4-1200 vs Atom x5-Z8500

AMD

A4-1200

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Atom x5-Z8500

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 2.24 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-1200 is positioned at rank 859 and the Atom x5-Z8500 is on rank 450, so the Atom x5-Z8500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-1200

#847
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1411%
#848
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1390%
#849
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1276%
#850
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1270%
#851
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1259%
#853
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1215%
#854
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1165%
#855
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1163%
#856
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1132%
#859
A4-1200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-Z8500

#438
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
591%
#439
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
582%
#440
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
534%
#441
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
532%
#442
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
527%
#444
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
509%
#445
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
488%
#446
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
487%
#447
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
474%
#450
Atom x5-Z8500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom x5-Z8500 leads in gaming performance. However, the A4-1200 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA4-1200Atom x5-Z8500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4-1200Atom x5-Z8500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-1200 and Atom x5-Z8500

AMD

A4-1200

The A4-1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,248 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Atom x5-Z8500

The Atom x5-Z8500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,242 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A4-1200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom x5-Z8500 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-Z8500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1200 versus 2.24 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8500 — a 76.5% clock advantage for the Atom x5-Z8500. The A4-1200 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom x5-Z8500 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1200 scores 1,248 against the Atom x5-Z8500's 1,242 — a 0.5% lead for the A4-1200. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA4-1200Atom x5-Z8500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1 GHz
2.24 GHz+124%
Base Clock
1.44 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Temash (2013)
Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
PassMark
1,248
1,242
Geekbench 6 Single
70
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1200 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x5-Z8500 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1200) vs 2 (Atom x5-Z8500). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1200) vs 2 (Atom x5-Z8500) — the A4-1200 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA4-1200Atom x5-Z8500
Socket
FT3
UTFCBGA1380
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1066
LPDDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8+300%
2
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-1200) / not specified (Atom x5-Z8500). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8180 (A4-1200) and Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x5-Z8500) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1200 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1200 rivals Atom Z2760.

FeatureA4-1200Atom x5-Z8500
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8180
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Tablet