A4-1200 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

CPU

GPU

A4-1200

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2009

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A4-1200 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 Performance Spectrum

A4-1200

2 / 2

1,248

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2 / 2

1,250

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-1200 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-1200 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-1200

2013

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8180, while Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (70 vs 150).
❌Lower PassMark (1,248 vs 1,250).
❌300% higher power demand at 4W vs 1W.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅+114.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 1W instead of 4W, a 3W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while A4-1200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-1200 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 better than A4-1200?

Yes. Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the better buy right now. Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-1200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-1200 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-1200

The A4-1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,248 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-1200 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1200 versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. The A4-1200 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1200 scores 1,248 against the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300's 1,250 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 70 vs 150, a 72.7% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4-1200	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1 GHz	1.2 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Temash (2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,248	1,250
Geekbench 6 Single	70	150+114%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	280

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1200 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the A4-1200 versus DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 — the A4-1200 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-1200 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1200) vs 2 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1200) vs 6 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) — the A4-1200 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-1200	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Socket	FT3	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066+33%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+33%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-1200) vs VT-x (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300). The A4-1200 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8180), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1200 targets Tablet, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile. Direct competitor: A4-1200 rivals Atom Z2760; Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.