A4-1200
VS
Celeron 2950M

A4-1200 vs Celeron 2950M

AMD

A4-1200

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron 2950M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-1200 is positioned at rank 859 and the Celeron 2950M is on rank 545, so the Celeron 2950M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-1200

#847
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1411%
#848
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1390%
#849
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1276%
#850
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1270%
#851
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1259%
#853
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1215%
#854
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1165%
#855
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1163%
#856
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1132%
#859
A4-1200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2950M

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
97%
#533
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
711%
#534
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
701%
#535
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
643%
#536
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
640%
#537
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
634%
#539
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
613%
#540
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
587%
#541
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
586%
#542
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
571%
#545
Celeron 2950M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
98%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron 2950M leads in gaming performance. However, the A4-1200 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA4-1200Celeron 2950M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4-1200Celeron 2950M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-1200 and Celeron 2950M

AMD

A4-1200

The A4-1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,248 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Celeron 2950M

The Celeron 2950M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,238 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

Both the A4-1200 and Celeron 2950M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1200 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron 2950M — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Celeron 2950M. The A4-1200 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 2950M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1200 scores 1,248 against the Celeron 2950M's 1,238 — a 0.8% lead for the A4-1200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 70 vs 352, a 133.6% lead for the Celeron 2950M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-1200 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2950M.

FeatureA4-1200Celeron 2950M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1 GHz
2 GHz+100%
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Temash (2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,248
1,238
Geekbench 6 Single
70
352+403%
Geekbench 6 Multi
636
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1200 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 2950M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1066 memory speed. The Celeron 2950M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1200) vs 2 (Celeron 2950M). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1200) vs 16 (Celeron 2950M) — the Celeron 2950M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA4-1200Celeron 2950M
Socket
FT3
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1066
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-1200) vs VT-x (Celeron 2950M). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8180 (A4-1200) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron 2950M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1200 targets Tablet, Celeron 2950M targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-1200 rivals Atom Z2760; Celeron 2950M rivals Pentium 2020M.

FeatureA4-1200Celeron 2950M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8180
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Tablet
Budget