A4-3330MX vs Pentium J2900

A4-3330MX vs Pentium J2900 Performance Spectrum

A4-3330MX

2 / 2

1,264

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium J2900

4 / 4

1,254

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3330MX vs Pentium J2900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3330MX vs Pentium J2900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3330MX

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6480G, while Pentium J2900 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.

Pentium J2900

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4-3330MX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,254 vs 1,264).
❌Launch MSRP is still $94 MSRP, while A4-3330MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3330MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-3330MX better than Pentium J2900?

Yes. A4-3330MX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-3330MX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-3330MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-3330MX is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A4-3330MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $94 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium J2900 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 5.0% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium J2900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-3330MX vs Pentium J2900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3330MX

The A4-3330MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,264 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium J2900

The Pentium J2900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,254 points. Launch price was $94.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-3330MX packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J2900 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J2900 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A4-3330MX versus 2.66 GHz on the Pentium J2900 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Pentium J2900 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.41 GHz). The A4-3330MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium J2900 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3330MX scores 1,264 against the Pentium J2900's 1,254 — a 0.8% lead for the A4-3330MX. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3330MX vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium J2900.

Feature	A4-3330MX	Pentium J2900
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	2.66 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.41 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB+100%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark	1,264	1,254
Geekbench 6 Single	263	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3330MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium J2900 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-3330MX	Pentium J2900
Socket	FS1	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-3330MX) / not specified (Pentium J2900). The A4-3330MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Pentium J2900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3330MX targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3330MX rivals Pentium B980.