
Radeon Xpress 1250 vs GeForce GT 330M

Radeon Xpress 1250
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 330M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 330M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 330M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 414% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Xpress 1250.
| Insight | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-414%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+414%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 330M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1250 and GeForce GT 330M

Radeon Xpress 1250
The Radeon Xpress 1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points. Launch price was $89.

GeForce GT 330M
The GeForce GT 330M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 221 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Xpress 1250 scores 43 versus the GeForce GT 330M's 221 — the GeForce GT 330M leads by 414%. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 330M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 384 (GeForce GT 330M). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 330M). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 43 | 221+414% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8064 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS+40% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1468 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 144 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Xpress 1250 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 330M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 330M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 330M) — the GeForce GT 330M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0b (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 330M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0b | 11 (10_1)+22% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs No (GeForce GT 330M). Decoder: Avivo vs PureVideo VP4.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | No |
| Decoder | Avivo | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Xpress 1250 draws 65W versus the GeForce GT 330M's 30W — a 73.7% difference. The GeForce GT 330M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 350W (GeForce GT 330M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 30W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 7.4+957% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 330M is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Codename | Oland | GP108 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #871 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











