GeForce GT 330M vs Quadro FX 1700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 330M is positioned at rank 114 and the Quadro FX 1700 is on rank 395, so the GeForce GT 330M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 330M

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

656%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

631%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

623%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

622%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

621%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

617%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

610%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

607%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

602%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

600%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

593%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

592%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

581%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

581%

#84

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H

MSRP: $350|Avg: $350

89%

#99

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

724%

#114

GeForce GT 330M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#115

GeForce 605

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

100%

#116

Radeon HD 8410G

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

98%

#117

RADEON HD6530D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

96%

#118

Moore Threads MTT S30

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

95%

#119

Radeon 535

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

95%

#122

GeForce GTS 450

MSRP: $129|Avg: $20

94%

#123

Radeon HD 8570D

MSRP: $40|Avg: $15

93%

#125

Radeon HD 8650G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

91%

#126

GeForce GT 630

MSRP: $69|Avg: $20

90%

#127

Radeon HD 6770

MSRP: $129|Avg: $129

89%

#129

GeForce GT 440

MSRP: $79|Avg: $40

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1700

#380

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

47655%

#395

Quadro FX 1700

MSRP: $699|Avg: $500

100%

#396

GRID P40-6Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

97%

#397

Quadro FX 540

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

87%

#398

Tesla M2070-Q

MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50

77%

#399

Quadro FX 1500

MSRP: $699|Avg: $30

77%

#400

Quadro 7000

MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300

77%

#401

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

74%

#402

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

74%

#403

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

71%

#404

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

65%

#405

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

65%

#407

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

58%

#408

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

55%

#410

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

52%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GT 330M is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The GeForce GT 330M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 330M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1700.

Insight	GeForce GT 330M	Quadro FX 1700
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 330M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 330M Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 1700 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 330M and Quadro FX 1700

GeForce GT 330M

The GeForce GT 330M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 221 points. Launch price was $79.

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 330M scores 221 and the Quadro FX 1700 reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 330M is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 1700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 330M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 330M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700).

Feature	GeForce GT 330M	Quadro FX 1700
G3D Mark Score	221+2%	216
Architecture	Pascal	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS+81%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 330M	Quadro FX 1700
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 330M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1700 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 330M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 330M) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 1700) — the GeForce GT 330M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 330M	Quadro FX 1700
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 330M) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 330M	Quadro FX 1700
DirectX	11 (10_1)+10%	10_0
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 330M draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 1700's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The GeForce GT 330M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 330M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.