A4-3330MX vs Pentium SU2700

A4-3330MX vs Pentium SU2700 Performance Spectrum

A4-3330MX

2 / 2

1,264

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium SU2700

1 / 1

1,268

+0.3%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3330MX vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3330MX vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3330MX

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6480G, while Pentium SU2700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,264 vs 1,268).
❌350% higher power demand at 45W vs 10W.

Pentium SU2700

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 45W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while A4-3330MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3330MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium SU2700 better than A4-3330MX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-3330MX is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU2700 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU2700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium SU2700 is the better buy right now. Pentium SU2700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that A4-3330MX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-3330MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-3330MX vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3330MX

The A4-3330MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,264 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-3330MX packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A4-3330MX has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A4-3330MX versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the A4-3330MX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The A4-3330MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3330MX scores 1,264 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium SU2700. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-3330MX	Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+100%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+69%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB+100%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,264	1,268
Geekbench 6 Single	263	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3330MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-3330MX	Pentium SU2700
Socket	FS1	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-3330MX) / not specified (Pentium SU2700). The A4-3330MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Pentium SU2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3330MX targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3330MX rivals Pentium B980.