A4-4355M vs Celeron G1820

A4-4355M vs Celeron G1820 Performance Spectrum

A4-4355M

2 / 2

1,690

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G1820

2 / 2

1,696

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4355M vs Celeron G1820 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4355M vs Celeron G1820: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4355M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 54W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (239 vs 496).
❌Lower PassMark (1,690 vs 1,696).

Celeron G1820

2013

Why buy it

✅+107.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $110 MSRP, while A4-4355M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌217.6% higher power demand at 54W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820 better than A4-4355M?

Yes. Celeron G1820 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1820 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1820 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1820 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $110 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1820 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-4355M vs Celeron G1820 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4355M

The A4-4355M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,690 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron G1820

The Celeron G1820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,696 points. Launch price was $110.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-4355M and Celeron G1820 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A4-4355M versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G1820 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A4-4355M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G1820 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4355M scores 1,690 against the Celeron G1820's 1,696 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G1820. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 239 vs 496, a 69.9% lead for the Celeron G1820 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-4355M vs 2 MB on the Celeron G1820.

Feature	A4-4355M	Celeron G1820
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.7 GHz+13%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.7 GHz+42%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,690	1,696
Geekbench 6 Single	239	496+108%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	910

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4355M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1820 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G1820 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A4-4355M	Celeron G1820
Socket	FP2	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-4355M) vs VT-x (Celeron G1820). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7400G (A4-4355M) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4355M targets Ultrathin Laptop, Celeron G1820 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-4355M rivals Pentium 2117U; Celeron G1820 rivals Pentium G3220.